Structuration in implementing Satu Data Indonesia policy in local government
Keywords:
Satu Data Indonesia, Policy, Local governmentAbstract
Although there is a lot of research on the implementation of data governance policies in Indonesia, there is still little research on the implementation of data governance policies from the aspects of structural and individual dialectic changes. To fill this gap, we analyze the implementation of “Satu Data Indonesia” Policy through the perspective of structuration theory. This study aims to explore and analyze dynamic relationships and interactions between individuals/groups, social structure, power, and individual reflexivity in the implementation process of Satu Data Indonesia Policy. The focus of research is directed at changing practices in the context of the implementation of Satu Data Indonesia Policy. This research design uses Critical Discourse Analysis with data collection techniques using documentation, studies and interviews. The results showed that agency strategies in the distribution of power and resources and reflexivity of actors to new structures influenced the successful implementation of Satu Data Indonesia policy at the local government level. The availability of infrastructure and human resource capabilities have an impact on the difference in success in each local government. In practical terms, the findings of this study can help policymakers to better understand the various dialectical impacts of interactions between policy structures and individuals on the successful implementation of Satu Data Indonesia policy.
References
[1] A. Giddens, Konsekuensi-Konsekuensi Modernitas. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana, 2005.
[2] R. Kasali, Disruption : Tak Ada yang Tak Bisa Diubah Sebelum Dihadapi, Motivasi Saja Tidak Cukup, vol. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2017.
[3] N. Bharosa, “The rise of GovTech: Trojan horse or blessing in disguise? A research agenda,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 39, 2022.
[4] S. J. Eom and J. Lee, “Digital government transformation in turbulent times: Responses, challenges, and future direction,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 39, no. 2, 2022.
[5] J. R. Gil-Garcia, S. S. Dawes, and T. A. Pardo, “Digital government and public management research: finding the crossroads,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 633–646, 2018.
[6] Z. A. Al-Sai and L. M. Abualigah, “Big data and E-government: A review,” in ICIT 2017 - 8th International Conference on Information Technology, Proceedings, 2017.
[7] P. P. Khine and W. Z. Shun, “Big data in government organizations: A review,” in 2017 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Big Data Analysis, ICBDA 2017, 2017.
[8] J. I. Criado and J. R. Gil-Garcia, “Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies: From digital services to artificial intelligence and beyond,” Int. J. Public Sect. Manag., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 438–450, 2019.
[9] H. Kim, “Interlinking open government data in Korea using administrative district knowledge graph,” J. Inf. Sci. Theory Pract., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 18–30, 2018.
[10] R. Tang and J. Jiang, “Characteristics of Open Government Data (OGD) Around the World: A Country-based Comparative Meta-Analysis,” in Data and Information Management, 2021, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 11–26.
[11] Y. P. Yuan et al., “Government Digital Transformation: Understanding the Role of Government Social Media,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 40, 2023.
[12] E. R. E. Sirait, “Implementasi Teknologi Big Data Di Lembaga Pemerintahan Indonesia,” J. Penelit. Pos dan Inform., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 113–136, 2016.
[13] Dewan TIK Nasional, “Mengejar Transformasi Digital Daerah,” e-Buletin Wantiknas, Jakarta, pp. 1–10, 2021.
[14] U. Kulsum, A. Nurmandi, I. Muallidin, M. J. Loilatu, and D. Kurniawan, “A Bibliometric Analysis of Open Government: Study on Indonesia and Philippines,” J. Gov., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 133–143, 2022.
[15] R. Rusdiah, “KOMITE.ID (Komunikasi Komunitas Telematika) : One Data & Digital Public Services For Golden Indonesia 2045,” PT Accesindo Internusa, no. 41, Jakarta, pp. 13–17, 2022.
[16] I. Ardani and H. S. H. Cahyani, “Tantangan Kebijakan Satu Data Indonesia: Studi Kasus pada Sistem Pencatatan Kematian danPenyebab Kematian di DKI Jakarta Indonesia’s One Data Policy Challenge: A Case Study on The Death and Cause of Death Registration System in Jakarta,” Bul. Penelit. Sist. Kesehat., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 52–60, 2022.
[17] M. J. Islami, “Implementasi Satu Data Indonesia: Tantangan dan Critical Success Factors (CSFs),” J. Komunika J. Komunikasi, Media dan Inform., vol. 10, no. 1, 2021.
[18] R. Maulidya and M. Rozikin, “Analisis Retrospektif Kebijakan Satu Data Indonesia,” Din. J. Ilm. Ilmu Adm. Negara, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 273, 2022.
[19] A. Giddens, Teori Strukturasi: Dasar-Dasar Pembentukan Struktur Sosial Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.
[20] N. Fairclough, Fairclough Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Longman Publishing, 1995.
[21] A. N. Soegiono and A. W. Prakasita, “Pemerintahan Terbuka Pasca-Ahok,” in Kebijakan Publik Kontemporer: Analisis Kumpulan Kasus Kebijakan di Indonesia, W. Kumorotomo, Ed. IGPA Press, 2019, pp. 209–227.
[22] Pemerintah Pusat, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia No 39 Tahun 2019 tentang Satu Data Indonesia. Indonesia, 2019, p. 35.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.