Urgency of face recognition technology in criminal investigation process: A formal legal perspective
Keywords:
Urgency, Face recognition technology, Criminal investigationAbstract
Face recognition technology is a system that utilizes face images from photos or videos to identify an individual. This system works by comparing face data obtained from images with a database sourced from the Civil Registration Office and internal police databases. The problem in this research is how urgent and how to implement facial recognition technology in the criminal investigation process in a formal legal perspective. This research aims to determine the urgency and implementation of face recognition technology in the criminal investigation process in a formal legal perspective. In this study, the author reviews and analyzes the development of face recognition technology as an artificial intelligence technology that is used to facilitate the tasks of law enforcement. Using a normative-empirical research type and a qualitative approach, this study is expected to reveal the challenges, benefits, and legal implications of using this technology. The results of this study show that face recognition technology has great potential in improving the efficiency of investigations and enhancing security in Indonesia. This technology plays a role in accelerating the identification process, increasing the accuracy of investigation results, expanding the scope of investigations, and supporting other investigative methods. This research contributes to identifying current knowledge gaps and is expected to provide practical solutions to existing problems and boost the efficiency and effectiveness of implementing face recognition technology in Indonesia.
References
[1] D. J. Imigrasi, “Dirjen Imigrasi: 620 WNA Nakal Dideportasi, Termasuk yang Viral di Bali.”
[2] F. S. Tarigan, “Implikasi Hukum Terhadap Penggunaan Teknologi Pengenalan Wajah: Kajian Literatur,” Judge J. Huk., vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 16–20, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.54209/judge.v4i01.375.
[3] S. A. Kusnadi, “Perlindungan Hukum Data Pribadi Sebagai Hak Privasi,” AL WASATH J. Ilmu Huk., 2021, doi: 10.47776/alwasath.v2i1.127.
[4] I. R. Gulo, S. Sunarmi, and M. Mulyadi, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dengan Predicat Crime Tindak Pidana Penipuan Yang Hartanya Dirampas Untuk Negara Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung NO. 3096 K/PID.SUS/2018,” J. RECTUM Tinj. Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 2023, doi: 10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i3.3496.
[5] C. T. Noerman and R. D. Agustanti, “Pertanggungjawaban Artificial Intelligence Sebagai Subjek Hukum Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” J. Huk. Samudra Keadilan, 2023, doi: 10.33059/jhsk.v18i2.8722.
[6] D. Samosir, “Berbagai Permasalahan Yang Muncul Sehubungan Dengan Perumusan KUHAP,” J. Huk. Pro Justitia, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.