Inspection scheduling decision model at CNG charging station using risk-based inspection (RBI) method
Keywords:
CNG charging station, RBI method, Fuel oilsAbstract
Most of the transportation industry is still dependent on fossil fuels. The use of fuel oil in the transportation industry has a negative impact on environmental pollution because fuel oil contains CO2. With the increasing use of fuel oil and environmental pollution problems, Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) is now being developed in the transportation industry. When compared to fuel oils such as gasoline, diesel, and Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG), CNG emits less harmful gas during combustion. CNG distribution requires a storage device, namely a buffer storage tank which is a closed vessel to accommodate liquids and gases with different temperatures and pressures according to environmental conditions. Buffer storage tanks have a very large risk of accidents including leaks that pose a hazard of fire, explosion, and environmental pollution, which has an impact on technical and financial aspects. Seeing the risks posed by the buffer storage tank, it is necessary to take precautions, inspections, and maintenance to minimize the risk of accidents. The results are the Probability of Failure value based on Art was 1, Leakage Risk Assessment was 247.87 ft2, and Economic Consequence was $199,514.04. Based on the results of risk analysis referring to API RBI 2008 for CNG buffer storage tanks, it means that leakage consequences are 1B (low risk) and the risk value for economic consequences is 1C (medium). The remaining life of the CNG buffer storage tank shell section is 10.14 years, and that of the head section is 10.42 years. This research is expected to be able to produce an appropriate inspection scheduling decision model for CNG buffer storage tanks and recommendations for preventive actions based on leakage risk and financial aspects.
References
[1] Badan Pusat Statistik, “Perkembangan Jumlah Kendaraan Bermotor Menurut Jenis (Unit), 2018-2020,” 2020. https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/17/57/1/perkembangan-jumlah-kendaraan-bermotor-menurut-jenis.html
[2] Kementrian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral, Kajian Penggunaan Faktor Emisi Lokal ( Tier 2 ) dalam Inventarisasi GRK Sektor Energi, no. Tier 2. 2017.
[3] A. Hartanto, V. Susanti, R. A. Subekti, H. M. Saputra, E. Rijanto, and A. Hapid, “PROGRAM KONVERSI DARI BBM KE BBG UNTUK KENDARAAN,” Pus. Penelit. Tenaga List. dan Mekatronik, no. 21, pp. 1–10, 2011, [Online]. Available: http://www.opi.lipi.go.id/data/1228964432/data/13086710321320817915.makalah.pdf
[4] Kementrian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral, “Statistik Minyak dan Gas Bumi Semester I 2021,” 2021.
[5] T. Luis, F. Brito, E. Moutinho, R. Galbieri, H. Katarina, and D. M. Costa, “Qualitative Comparative Analysis of cities that introduced compressed natural gas to their urban bus fl eet,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., no. August 2015, pp. 0–1, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.077.
[6] M. Al Qathafi and Sulistijono, “Studi Aplikasi Metode Risk Based Inspection (RBI) Semi-Kuantitatif API 581 pada Production Separator,” vol. 4, no. 1, 2015.
[7] W. Investigations, “Explosion in pressure vessel during well completion,” no. September, pp. 1–20, 2008.
[8] Hindustan Times, “1 killed, two hurt in explosion at CNG station in Mansa,” 2021. https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/others/1-killed-two-hurt-in-explosion-at-cng-station-in-mansa-101626022058699.html
[9] Loy-Lange Box Company, “Pressure Vessel Explosion at Loy-Lange Box Company Investigation Report,” no. 2017, 2022.
[10] Y. Li, X. He, and J. Shuai, “Risk analysis and maintenance decision making of natural gas pipelines with external corrosion based on Bayesian network,” Pet. Sci., no. xxxx, pp. 0–11, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.petsci.2021.09.016.
[11] B. Xin, W. Dang, X. Yan, J. Yu, and Y. Bai, “Dispersion characteristics and hazard area prediction of mixed natural gas based on wind tunnel experiments and risk theory,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 152, pp. 278–290, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.06.012.
[12] S. He, H. Xu, J. Zhang, and P. Xue, “Risk assessment of oil and gas pipelines hot work based on AHP-FCE,” Petroleum, no. xxxx, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.petlm.2022.03.006.
[13] L. Kraidi, R. Shah, W. Matipa, and F. Borthwick, “An investigation of mitigating the safety and security risks allied with oil and gas pipeline projects,” J. Pipeline Sci. Eng., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 349–359, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jpse.2021.08.002.
[14] Y. Zhang et al., “Advanced monitoring and simulation for underground gas storage risk management,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 208, no. November 2021, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109763.
[15] API, “Risk-Based Inspection Technology,” no. September, p. 306, 2008.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.