Integrating life cycle assessment with lean assessment matrix: A framework for sustainable automotive manufacturing evaluation

Integrating life cycle assessment with lean assessment matrix: A framework for sustainable automotive manufacturing evaluation

Authors

  • Nadia Fasa Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Karawang, Indonesia
  • Dene Herwanto Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Karawang, Indonesia
  • Apid Hapid Maksum Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Karawang, Indonesia
  • Sophia Fadhila Albany Tanjung Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Karawang, Indonesia
  • Haniyyah Azhar Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Karawang, Indonesia

Keywords:

Sustainable manufacturing, Automotive industry, Life cycle assessment, Lean assessment matrix, Performance evaluation, Waste prioritization

Abstract

Automotive manufacturers face growing pressure to improve efficiency while reducing environmental impacts, but standard waste assessment tools largely overlook energy use and material losses. This study develops an integrated evaluation framework that combines a lean assessment matrix with life cycle based environmental indicators to support waste prioritization in automotive manufacturing. A rapid review of 27 relevant articles informs the framework design, resulting in a matrix that links process wastes to non-value added activities, root causes, and five performance indicators: economic performance, process flow, quality, energy use, and material and waste generation. A scoring system based on a discrete rating scale is proposed to convert heterogeneous operational and environmental data into severity scores and priority ranks for each waste type. This enables comparison of improvement options on an everyday basis that reflects both productivity and environmental impact. The framework extends lean assessment beyond traditional operational measures and provides a structured basis for sustainability-oriented decision-making in automotive manufacturing.

References

[1] A. S. Kemala and D. L. Widaningrum, “Integrating Lean Manufacturing and Environmental Sustainability,” Jurnal Teknik Industri: Jurnal Keilmuan dan Aplikasi Teknik Industri, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 213–224, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.9744/jti.27.2.213-224.

[2] S. Stefanoni and A. Voltes-Dorta, “Technical efficiency of car manufacturers under environmental and sustainability pressures: A Data Envelopment Analysis approach,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 311, p. 127589, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127589.

[3] N. Verma, V. Sharma, and M. A. Badar, “Entropy-Based Lean, Energy and Six Sigma Approach to Achieve Sustainability in Manufacturing System,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng., vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 8105–8117, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13369-021-05826-x.

[4] N. Fasa and D. Karningsih, “Modification of Lean Assessment Matrix (LAM) Tool with Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Key Performance Indicator (KPI),” The 2nd International Conference on Management of Technology, Innovation, and Project, 2021.

[5] M. Braglia, F. Di Paco, R. Gabbrielli, C. Grassi, and L. Marrazzini, “Greenhouse gas Emissions Deployment (GED): A novel Lean method for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions in industrial environment,” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 48, pp. 29–45, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2024.05.008.

[6] M. Kumar and M. Mani, “Sustainability Assessment in Manufacturing for Effectiveness: Challenges and Opportunities,” Frontiers in Sustainability, vol. 3, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3389/frsus.2022.837016.

[7] S. Mat Dahan and S. M. Yusof, “Review and proposed eco-process innovation performance framework,” International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 123–139, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1080/19397038.2019.1644387.

[8] L. Rossi et al., “Life Cycle Assessment tool for environmental characterization of manufacturing companies: a methodological guidance,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), IEEE, Jun. 2023, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1109/ICE/ITMC58018.2023.10332269.

[9] D. Rovelli, C. Brondi, M. Andreotti, E. Abbate, M. Zanforlin, and A. Ballarino, “A Modular Tool to Support Data Management for LCA in Industry: Methodology, Application and Potentialities,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 3746, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14073746.

[10] Z. Sherif, S. Sarfraz, M. Jolly, and K. Salonitis, “Identification of the Right Environmental KPIs for Manufacturing Operations: Towards a Continuous Sustainability Framework,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 21, p. 7690, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ma15217690.

[11] A. Barni et al., “Design of a Lifecycle-Oriented Environmental and Economic Indicators Framework for the Mechanical Manufacturing Industry,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 2602, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14052602.

[12] G. Taddese, S. Durieux, and E. Duc, “Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Faceshield Bracket Manufacturing by Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 24, p. 13883, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132413883.

[13] S. Hartini, J. Manurung, and R. Rumita, “Sustainable-value stream mapping to improve manufacturing sustainability performance: Case study in a natural dye batik SME’s,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1072, no. 1, p. 012066, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1072/1/012066.

[14] A. C. Tricco et al., “Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis,” Apr. 01, 2018, Elsevier USA. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.014.

[15] M. Gordon, C. Grafton-Clarke, E. Hill, D. Gurbutt, M. Patricio, and M. Daniel, “Twelve tips for undertaking a focused systematic review in medical education,” Med. Teach., vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1232–1238, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1513642.

[16] Z. Sherif and K. Salonitis, “A systematic review of decision tools for process selection and performance improvement in manufacturing,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 141, no. 3–4, pp. 1113–1141, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00170-025-16806-y.

[17] W. Abualfaraa, M. AlManei, R. Kaur, A. Al-Ashaab, P. McLaughlin, and K. Salonitis, “A Synergetic Framework for Green and Lean Manufacturing Practices in SMEs: Saudi Arabia Perspective,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 596, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su15010596.

[18] F. Ghasemibojd, M. J. Franchetti, and B. George, “Green lean six sigma for sustainable development: a systematic review of evolution, challenges, and future pathways,” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, vol. 27, no. 13, pp. 9239–9262, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10098-025-03281-y.

[19] A. Ibrahim and G. Kumar, “Identification and Prioritization of Critical Success Factors of a Lean Six Sigma–Industry 4.0 Integrated Framework for Sustainable Manufacturing Using TOPSIS,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 1331, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17031331.

[20] D. M. Utama and M. Abirfatin, “Sustainable Lean Six-sigma: A new framework for improve sustainable manufacturing performance,” Clean. Eng. Technol., vol. 17, p. 100700, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2023.100700.

[21] G. A. Queiroz, A. G. A. Filho, and I. Costa Melo, “Competitive Priorities and Lean–Green Practices—A Comparative Study in the Automotive Chain’ Suppliers,” Machines, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 50, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/machines11010050.

[22] H. Kurnia, A. A. Sulaeman, and V. S. Pasha, “Integration of lean and green manufacturing to speed up the automotive parts production process for sustainability orders from customers,” Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 89–106, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.30656/jsmi.v8i2.8831.

[23] M. Fiorello, B. Gladysz, D. Corti, M. Wybraniak-Kujawa, K. Ejsmont, and M. Sorlini, “Towards a smart lean green production paradigm to improve operational performance,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 413, p. 137418, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137418.

[24] M. M. Matonya and I. Budai, “Cloud-Based Data-Driven Framework for Optimizing Operational Efficiency and Sustainability in Tube Manufacturing,” Applied System Innovation, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 100, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.3390/asi8040100.

[25] S. Claudio et al., “Efficiency Meets Sustainability: A Comprehensive Assessment of Order Picking Performance,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 2004–2009, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.09.337.

[26] M. A. Omar, “The Automotive Body Manufacturing Systems and Processes,” A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication, 2011.

[27] M. Goenka, C. Nihal, R. Ramanathan, P. Gupta, and A. Parashar, “ScienceDirect Automobile Parts Casting-Methods and Materials Used: A Review,” 2019. [Online]. Available: www.sciencedirect.com

[28] H. Gupta, R. Gupta, and A. Mittal, “Manufacturing Processes, Second Edition.”

[29] M. P. Groover, Fundamentals of modern manufacturing: Materials, processes, and systems , 8th ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2020.

[30] V. S. K. R. B. T. S. W. R. G. K. Awari, Automotive Manufacturing Processes (A Case Study Approach). CRC Press, 2024.

[31] Metal Fabricators, “The Role of Welding in the Automotive Industry: From Parts to Performance,” https://nwmetalfab.com/2025/04/the-role-of-welding-in-the-automotive-industry-from-parts-to-performance/.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

How to Cite

Integrating life cycle assessment with lean assessment matrix: A framework for sustainable automotive manufacturing evaluation. (2026). BIS Energy and Engineering, 3, V326031. https://doi.org/10.31603/biseeng.573

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 108

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.