Investigation of employees performance of Indonesian electricity company
Keywords:
Psychological capital, Learning agility, Psychosocial safety climate, Employee performanceAbstract
PLN as a state-owned company that plays role in supplying electricity needs certainly needs to be supported by excellence performance. The research aims to determine the factors that affect employee performance. This study is a quantitative study using four questionnaires, namely the psychological capital questionnaire, learning agility questionnaire, psychosocial safety climate questionnaire, and employee performance questionnaire. The subjects of the study were employees of PLN Central Java-DIY Region. The data collected were then analyzed using multiple regression methods, using SPSS ver.26. The results of the study showed that psychological capital, learning agility, and psychosocial safety climate simultaneously had a significant positive effect on employee performance. The adjusted R square value is 0.505, which means that the effect of psychological capital, learning agility, and psychosocial safety climate on employee performance simultaneously are 50.5%. However, further partial analysis data shows that psychosocial safety climate has no effect on performance, only psychological capital and learning agility shows a significant positive effect on employee performance. Based on these results, the implications of these findings can be used in organization to develop activities that can strengthen employee psychological capital and learning agility to support employee performance enhancement as expected.
References
1. Anggraini, S. D., & Fachrian, A., (2024). Gambaran Persepsi Psychosocial Safety Climate Pada Pegawai Di PT. Abhipraya Teknik Mandiri. Jurnal Islamika Granada, 2(2), 60–68.
2. Aprilia, N., & Hidayat, H. (2024). Pengaruh Pelatihan Dan Learning Agility Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Di Pt Excelitas Technologies Batam. Jurnal Manajemen & Bisnis Jayakarta, 6(01), 181–191.
3. Arikunto, 2012, Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
4. Avey, Reichard, Luthans, dan Mhatre (2011). Metaanalysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and employee performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22 (2) 127- 152.
5. Choirah, A. (2013). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Emosional, Kecerdasan Intelektual, Kecerdasan Spiritual, dan Etika Profesi terhadap Kinerja Auditor dalam Kantor Akuntan Publik (Studi Empiris pada Auditor dalam Kantor Akntan Publik di Kota Padang dan Pekanbaru). Jurnal Akuntansi, 1(1): 3-22
6. De Meuse, K. P., Dai, G., & Hallenbeck, G. S. (2010). Learning agility: A construct whose time has come. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(2), 119.
7. Dollard, M. F. (2007). Psychosocial safety culture and climate; definition of a new construct. Adelaide: Work and Stress Research Group, University of South Australia
8. Dollard, M. F., Tuckey, M. R., & Dormann, C. (2012). Psychosocial safety climate moderates the job demand-resource interaction in predicting workgroup distress. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45, 694–704.
9. Gravett, L. S., & Caldwell, S. A. (2016). Learning Agility. Contemporary Talent Management, 126–144.
10. Hafid, H., & Edy, S. A. (2023). Pengaruh Loyalitas dan Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) terhadap Kinerja Pegawai dengan Psychological Capital sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi Pada Badan Pendapatan Daerah Kabupaten Majene). SEIKO: Journal of Management & Business, 6 (2), 262–270.
11. Hall, G. B., Dollard, M. F., & Coward, J. (2010). Psychosocial safety climate: Development of the PSC12. International Journal of Stress Management, 17(4), 353–383
12. Heider, Fritz. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, New York: Wiley.
13. Khildani, A. C., Suhermin, & Lestariningsih, M. (2022). Pengaruh Efikasi Diri dan Lokus Kendali terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Melalui Learning Agility. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Keuangan, 10(2), 208–228.
14. Luthans et al. (2007). Positive Psychological Capital: Measurement and Relationship with Employee performance and Satisfaction Part of the Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Commons. Personnel Psychology, 60, 541-572
15. Okolie, U., Emoghene, A. (2019). Psychological capital and employee employee performance in federal neuro-psychiatric hospital, benn city, edo state, negeria. An International Scientific Journal, 1 (17) 122-136.
16. Putri, C. A., & Kistyanto, A. (2019). Pengaruh modal psikologis terhadap kinerja melalui burnout di PT PLN (Persero) UID Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ekonomi Modernisasi, 15(2), 117–127.
17. Salsabila, A. T., & Megawaty, M. (2023). Pengaruh Learning Agility Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Regional 6 Sulawesi Maluku Dan Papua. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 12(2), 189–201.
18. Sugiyono. 2022. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
19. Triccia, A. D., & Satiningsih. (2020). Hubungan psychological capital dengan kinerja pada karyawan di perusahaan x. Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 7(4), 1–12.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.