Mapping the collateral object within ar-rahn contract from its classical rulings to the current issues
Keywords:
Mapping, Collateral object, Ar-rahn, Classical rulings, IssuesAbstract
Ar-rahn scheme is one of many contracts in Islamic law that helps the people’s financial needs. It came to modify the same scheme that practiced in Jahiliyah era, where the creditor can freely take the collateral object whenever the pledgor unable to pay the debt. However, despite the prophetic practice and the generated rules, there are still legal issues that still arise. One of the issue areas of ar-rahn contract is about the collateral object (marhūn). Thus, this study aimed to draw the map of what classical rulings on ar-rahn and its issues development in modern era. This discussion is a qualitative type of study and it has involved the secondary data. The data analyzed through content analysis approach within the classical Islamic rulings from Four Islamic Mazhabs. Through the practice of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and the classical rulings generated by the Fuqaha of Islamic Mazhabs, the issues of ar-rahn contract can be drawn and related it to the current development issues. The study shows that the collateral object issues could be referred back to two areas, both are the collateral type and the collateral ownership. The map has described that there is an agreement between Fuqaha on the Shariah compliance type of collateral. It has to be valuable objects that permitted by Shariah. Through this topic area, it raised the issue of mixed compliance object that need to be divided first before it could be pledged. Second issue is the ownership where Fuqaha also agree to its principle, even though it is not the pledgor’s belonging it needs to be through the owner permission to be pledged. This ownership’s topic area has been breached by current development issues where someone pledge the undivided shared-inheritance without other heirs’ consent. On the other hand, the legal violation is done by Islamic financial institution where it auctioned the pledged-object without the pledgor’s permission.
References
S. Ullah Khan, “Ethics of Gold Intallment Plans in Pakistani Sharia Banks: Perspective of a Sharia Economic Law,” J. Justisia Ekon. Magister Huk. Ekon. Syariah, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1042–1055, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.30651/justeko.v8i1.22273.
2. J. Uddin and W. Afriadi, “Karakteristik Dinamisitas Hukum Muamalah Tentang Rahn dalam Teori dan Praktik (Pertarungan Antara Formalitas Versus Substansialitas Hukum Muamalah),” J. Justisia Ekon. Magister Huk. Ekon. Syariah, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 479–491, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.30651/justeko.v6i2.14264.
3. L. Hussain and M. M. Ali, “Sharīʿah Non-Compliant Assets as Rahn (Pledge) in Islamic Banking Products: A Fiqhī Perspective,” ISRA Int. J. Islam. Financ., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 196–199, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1108/IJIF-08-2017-0018.
4. M. J. T. McMillen, “Rahn Concepts in Saudi Arabia: Formalization and a Registration and Prioritization System,” in Islamic Capital Markets, Wiley, 2012, ch. 1, pp. 1–21. doi: 10.1002/9781119206040.ch1.
5. W. D. Suryandari, “The Application of Fiduciary Guarantee in the Perspective of Islamic Law,” J. Daulat Huk., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 260–268, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.30659/jdh.v4i4.17952.
6. F. Muhammadi, “Analisis Isu-Isu Perlaksanaan Ar-Rahn dalam Operasi Lembaga Kewangan Syariah Indonesia Menurut Perspektif Fiqh dan Undang-Undang,” Universiti Malaya, 2025.
7. A. B. Awang, A. S. Md Harun, M. A. Awang Hamat, and M. Sitiris, “Al-Rahn from an Islamic Jurisprudential Perspective,” Al-Hikmah Int. J. Islam. Stud. Hum. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://alhikmah.my/index.php/hikmah/article/view/564
8. A. H. A. bin U. bin A. bin M. bin M. bin A.-N. bin D. A.-B. Al-Daruqutni, Sunan Al-Daruqutni. Beirut: Muassasah Risalah, 2004.
9. A. S. H. Ibn Muhammad Al-Khitabi, A’lam Al-Hadits. Saudi Arabia: Markaz Al-Buhuts Al-Ilmiyah Wa Ihya Al-Turats Al-Islami, 1988.
10. A. AL-Juzairi, Kitab Al-Fiqh ’Alal Madzahib Al-Arba’ah. Cairo: Al-Maktabah Al-Taufiqiyah.
11. I. Qudāmah, Al-Mughnī, 3rd ed. Riyadh: Dār Alam Al-Kutub, 1997.
12. A. B. bin Y. bin A. Al-Zarqani, Syarḥ Al-Zarqānī ‘alā Mukhtaṣar Khalīl. Beirut: Darul Kutub Al-Ilmiah, 2002.
13. A. Z. Y. bin S. Al-Nawawi, Rauḍat Al-Ṭālibīn. Saudi Arabia: Dar Alamil Kutub, 2003.
14. W. Al-Zuhaili, Al-Fiqh Al-Islamiy Wa Adillatuhu, 2nd ed. Damaskus: Darul Fikr, 1985.
15. Z. Judge, “The Legal Dynamics of the Transfer of Rights Over Undivided Inherited Land and the Legal Consequences on the Validity of the Sale and Purchase Deed,” Pena Justisia Media Komun. dan Kaji. Huk., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 6674–6689, May 2025, doi: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6538.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.