Response inhibition and self-reported crashes in young Indonesian motorcyclists
Keywords:
Response inhibition, Self-reported crashes, Motorcyclist, IndonesiaAbstract
Response inhibition, the ability to suppress inappropriate responses in goal-directed behavior, is one of the cognitive abilities associated with driving performance. This study investigated differences in response inhibition based on self-reported crashes in young Indonesian motorcyclists. Response inhibition was assessed using STOP-IT, an open-source software to run stop-signal tasks and analyze the data, which has been adapted and validated for use in Indonesian samples. The participants comprised 67 motorcyclists aged 19-25 with normal or corrected-to-normal vision and right-handed. The findings showed a significant difference in response inhibition based on self-reported crashes in the past year. Participants who had not been involved in a crash demonstrated better response inhibition than those who had. However, response inhibition did not differ significantly when considering self-reported crashes from the past three years, five years, or overall riding history. While further research is needed, the findings support an association between response inhibition and driving performance. Given that response inhibition continues to mature during adolescence, the government, parents, and schools should collaborate to strengthen the implementation of minimum driving age regulations.
References
N. P. Friedman dan A. Miyake, “Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure,” Cortex, vol. 86, hal. 186–204, Jan 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023.
2. A. Diamond, “Executive functions,” Annu. Rev. Psychol., vol. 64, hal. 135–168, 2013, doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.
3. F. Verbruggen dan G. D. Logan, “Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm,” Trends Cogn. Sci., vol. 12, no. 11, hal. 418–424, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.005.Response.
4. J. Tiego, R. Testa, M. A. Bellgrove, C. Pantelis, dan S. Whittle, “A hierarchical model of inhibitory control,” Front. Psychol., vol. 9, no. AUG, hal. 1–25, 2018, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01339.
5. Y. You, A. Failla, dan J. Van Der Kamp, “No training effects of top-down controlled response inhibition by practicing on the stop-signal task,” Acta Psychol., vol. 235, no. March, hal. 1–12, 2023.
6. E. Argyriou, C. B. Davison, dan T. T. C. Lee, “Response inhibition and internet gaming disorder: A meta-analysis,” Addict. Behav., vol. 71, hal. 54–60, 2017.
7. J. L. Smith, R. P. Mattick, S. D. Jamadar, dan J. M. Iredale, “Deficits in behavioural inhibition in substance abuse and addiction: A meta-analysis,” 1 Desember 2014, Elsevier Ireland Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.08.009.
8. E. A. Walshe, C. W. McIntosh, D. Romer, dan F. K. Winston, “Executive function capacities, negative driving behavior and crashes in young drivers,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 14, no. 11, hal. 1–16, 2017, doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111314.
9. N. S. Kusumastutie, B. Patria, S. Kusrohmaniah, dan T. D. Hastjarjo, “Drivers’ decision-making when experiencing a traffic conflict: A scoping review,” Transp. Res. Rec., hal. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.1177/03611981231211525.
10. C. Moran, J. M. Bennett, dan P. Prabhakharan, “The relationship between cognitive function and hazard perception in younger drivers,” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., vol. 74, hal. 104–119, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.08.008.
11. V. Ross, E. Jongen, T. Brijs, R. Ruiter, K. Brijs, dan G. Wets, “The relation between cognitive control and risky driving in young novice drivers,” Appl. Neuropsychol., vol. 22, no. 1, hal. 61–72, Jan 2015, doi: 10.1080/23279095.2013.838958.
12. N. S. Kusumastutie, B. Patria, S. Kusrohmaniah, dan T. D. Hastjarjo, “Hazardous traffic scenarios for motorcyclists in Indonesia: A comprehensive insight from police accident data and self-reports,” Int. J. Inj. Contr. Saf. Promot., 2024, doi: 10.1080/17457300.2024.2335495.
13. World Health Organization, Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018.
14. A. Kurniawan dan S. Kusrohmaniah, “Performa inhibitory control dengan induksi sing-a-song stress test pada dewasa awal [Inhibitory control performance with sing-a-song stress test induction in young adults],” J. Psikol., vol. 45, no. 1, hal. 40–51, 2018.
15. H. A. S. Murti, “Peran berpikir kritis dan inhibisi kognitif pada miskonsepsi psikologi [The role of critical thinking and cognitive inhibition on misconceptions in psychology],” Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 2023.
16. I. D. K. Wasistha, L. T. Widhianingtanti, dan Y. B. Wismanto, “The relationship between executive function with learning agility in police officers,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Psychological Studies (ICPsyche), 2023, hal. 299–307.
17. I. R. Yusron dan S. Kusrohmaniah, “Efektivitas training fungsi eksekutif terkomputerisasi dalam meningkatkan kapasitas fungsi eksekutif dan performa akademik Matematika [The effectiveness of computerized executive function training in improving executive function capacity and Mathematics performance],” Gadjah Mada J. Prof. Psychol., vol. 6, no. 2, hal. 177, Okt 2020, doi: 10.22146/gamajpp.54712.
18. A. R. Afandi dan G. Lufityanto, “Pengaruh pelatihan Go/NoGo Task terhadap resiliensi ditinjau dari inhibitory control pada Taruna Akademi Militer Indonesia [The impact of Go/No-Go Task training on resilience assessed through inhibitory control in Indonesian Military Academy Cadets],” Gadjah Mada J. Prof. Psychol., vol. 9, no. 1, hal. 1–24, 2023, doi: 10.22146/gamajpp.79237.
19. L. Chairani, “Peran moderasi religiusitas pada pengaruh atensi visual terhadap inhibisi respons seksual laki-laki muslim [The moderating role of religiosity on the effect of visual attention on sexual response inhibition in muslim men],” Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 2023.
20. F. Jannatan, “Pengaruh induksi emosi menggunakan stimulus visual terhadap inhibitory control yang diukur menggunakan Stop-Signal Task [The effect of emotional induction using visual stimuli on inhibitory control as measured using the Stop-Signal Task],” Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 2020.
21. C. Malagoli dan M. C. Usai, “The effects of gender and age on inhibition and working memory organization in 14- to 19-year-old adolescents and young adults,” Cogn. Dev., vol. 45, hal. 10–23, Jan 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.10.005.
22. F. Verbruggen et al., “A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task,” Elife, vol. 8, hal. 1–26, Apr 2019, doi: 10.7554/eLife.46323.
23. International Test Commission, “The ITC Guidelines for translating and Adapting Test,” 2017. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1975.tb00322.x.
24. E. Congdon, J. A. Mumford, J. R. Cohen, A. Galvan, T. Canli, dan R. A. Poldrack, “Measurement and reliability of response inhibition,” Front. Psychol., vol. 3, no. FEB, hal. 1–10, 2012, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00037.
25. A. Poulton, L. Peng, E. Chen, G. Dali, M. Fox, dan R. Hester, “Web-based independent versus laboratory-based stop-signal task performance: Within-subjects counterbalanced comparison study,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 24, no. 5, hal. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.2196/32922.
26. D. M. D. Tran, N. S. Chowdhury, J. A. Harris, dan E. J. Livesey, “The effect of staircase stopping accuracy and testing environment on stop ‑ signal reaction time,” Behav. Res. Methods, no. 0123456789, 2023, doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02058-1.
27. K. O. McGraw dan S. P. Wong, “Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients,” Psychol. Methods, vol. 1, no. 1, hal. 30–46, 1996, doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30.
28. T. K. Koo dan M. Y. Li, “A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research,” J. Chiropr. Med., vol. 15, no. 2, hal. 155–163, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
29. M. A. Goss-Sampson, Statistical Analysis in JASP: A Guide for Student. 2024.
30. R. K. Hambleton dan A. L. Zenisky, “Translating and adapting test for cross-sultural assessments,” in Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology, D. Matsumo dan F. J. R. van de Vijver, Ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 3, hal. 46–74.
31. S. E. Christ, D. A. White, T. Mandernach, dan B. A. Keys, “Inhibitory control across the life span,” Dev. Neuropsychol., vol. 20, no. 3, hal. 653–669, 2001, doi: 10.1207/S15326942DN2003_7.
32. A. Sebastian et al., “Differential effects of age on subcomponents of response inhibition,” Neurobiol. Aging, vol. 34, no. 9, hal. 2183–2193, Sep 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.03.013.
33. C. shan R. Li, C. Huang, R. T. Constable, dan R. Sinha, “Gender differences in the neural correlates of response inhibition during a stop signal task,” Neuroimage, vol. 32, no. 4, hal. 1918–1929, Okt 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.017.
34. J. Adrian, M. Moessinger, A. Charles, dan V. Postal, “Exploring the contribution of executive functions to on-road driving performance during aging: A latent variable analysis,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 127, hal. 96–109, Jun 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.010.
35. N. A. Kamaluddin, C. S. Andersen, M. K. Larsen, K. R. Meltofte, dan A. Várhelyi, “Self-reporting traffic crashes-a systematic literature review,” Eur. Transp. Res. Rev., vol. 10, no. 26, hal. 1–18, 2018, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-018-0301-0
36. A. E. Af Wåhlberg dan L. Dorn, “How reliable are self-report measures of mileage, violations and crashes?,” Saf. Sci., vol. 76, hal. 67–73, Jul 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.02.020.
37. N. S. Kusumastutie dan E. W. Saptandari, “Sekarang atau nanti? Sebuah studi mixed methods tentang keputusan ibu dari siswa SMP untuk mengizinkan anak berkendara sepeda motor (Now or later? A mixed-methods study on the decisions of mothers of junior high school students to allow their children to riding motorcycles),” J. Psikol., vol. 16, no. 1, hal. 160–178, 2023, doi: 10.35760/psi.2023.v16i1.6159.
38. Y. Umniyatun, M. I. Nurmansyah, Y. Farradika, T. B. Purnama, dan D. N. Hidayat, “Motorcycle risky behaviours and road accidents among adolescents in Jakarta metropolitan area, Indonesia,” Int. J. Inj. Contr. Saf. Promot., vol. 28, no. 3, hal. 339–346, 2021, doi: 10.1080/17457300.2021.1928229.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.