Enhancing the implementation of smart ports through data governance and human resource development: Case Study of Tanjung Perak Port, Surabaya, Indonesia

Enhancing the implementation of smart ports through data governance and human resource development: Case Study of Tanjung Perak Port, Surabaya, Indonesia

Authors

  • Irma Rachmawati Maruf Universitas Pasundan Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

Keywords:

Smart ports, Data governance, Human resource development, Internet of things, Regulatory sandbox

Abstract

The transformation of conventional ports into smart ports through the application of the Internet of Things (IoT) faces two main challenges, namely effective data governance and human resource capacity building. This study examines the contribution of data governance and technology integration to the operational efficiency of smart ports, identifies implementation barriers, evaluates their impact on port competitiveness through reducing dwelling time, and develops a progressive policy model that integrates regulatory innovation with human resource development. This study uses a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design, which combines quantitative, qualitative, and regulatory analysis at Tanjung Perak Port, Surabaya. Quantitative data from 48 port workers were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data from stakeholder interviews and field observations were analyzed using thematic content analysis. The regulatory analysis examines Indonesia's smart port legal framework through a document review and compares it with Dutch and Singapore regulations to identify harmonization gaps and compliance challenges with international conventions. The implementation of the Terminal Booking System (TBS) has succeeded in reducing dwelling time from four days to two to three days (an increase of more than 25%), with 95.8% of workers reporting reduced workload. AI and data analytics skills. The regulatory analysis reveals that although Indonesia already has adequate smart port regulations, the challenge of harmonizing between existing legal frameworks and international conventions is still ongoing. This research proposes a tripartite policy architecture that integrates regulatory sandbox mechanisms adapted from the financial technology sector, immediate advanced technology training programs, and standardized certifications to bridge the workforce capacity gap.

References

1. Dwinovan, N., Dillah, A. R., Najmuddin, F., & Verawati, K. (2024). Eksplorasi Potensi Penggunaan Blockchain Dalam Optimalisasi Manajemen Pelabuhan di Indonesia: Tinjauan Literatur. Jurnal Multidisiplin Dehasen (MUDE), 3(3), 277–286.

2. Gao, J., Sun, Y., Rameezdeen, R., & Chow, C. (2024). Understanding data governance requirements in IoT adoption for smart ports–a gap analysis. Maritime Policy and Management, 51(4), 617–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2022.2155318

3. Jahn, C., & Nellen, N. (2022). Smart port concept: strategic development, best practices, perspectives of development. In Arctic Maritime Logistics: The Potentials and Challenges of the Northern Sea Route (pp. 81–93). Springer.

4. Li, K., Wang, L., Gharehgozli, A., Joo, S.-J., & Lee, J.-Y. (2025). Optimal quality design of smart technologies for port digitalization: A game theoretical approach under digitalization synergy. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104459

5. Maruf, I. R. (2023). Water Pollution Caused by Collision and Its Impact on The Marine Environment. Proceedings of the International Conference on “Changing of Law: Business Law, Local Wisdom and Tourism Industry” (ICCLB 2023).

6. Maruf, M. (2026). Strengthening capacity building in developing countries for effective maritime law enforcement: Current practices, challenges, and future outlook. Marine Policy, 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2025.107015

7. Paraskevas, A., Madas, M., & Nikolaidis, Y. (2025). Using Neutrosophic Cognitive Maps to Support Group Decisions About Modeling and Analyzing Smart Port Performance. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041981

8. Paraskevas, A., Madas, M., Zeimpekis, V., & Fouskas, K. (2024). Smart ports in industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. Logistics, 8(1), 28.

9. Perkovič, M., Gucma, L., & Feuerstack, S. (2024). Maritime Security and Risk Assessments. In Journal of Marine Science and Engineering (Vol. 12, Number 6). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12060988

10. Priadi, A. A. (2022). Optimalization of Smart Technologies in Improving Sustainable Maritime Transportation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 972(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/972/1/012084

11. Rachmawati, I., & Rastuti, T. (2023). The Development Of Conventional To Contemporary Port Policy: The Bibliometric Analysis. ID Patent App. EC002,023,105,046.

12. Wang, K. (2024). Map evidence for the Philippines’ territorial claim in the South China Sea: a historical, cartographical and legal analysis. Pacific Review, 37(6), 1177–1197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2024.2317952

13. Wiko, G., Kinanti, F. M., Syafei, M., Darajati, M. R., & Sudagung, A. D. (2023). TANJUNGPURA PORT AS AN INTERNATIONAL HUB PORT TO IMPROVE ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS: AN OVERVIEW FROM INTERNATIONAL LAW. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol21.1.4

14. Zhou, Z. (2006). Maritime security and the common interests of India and China. Frontiers of Law in China, 1(3), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11463-006-0015-4

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Enhancing the implementation of smart ports through data governance and human resource development: Case Study of Tanjung Perak Port, Surabaya, Indonesia. (2026). BIS Humanities and Social Science, 4, V426025. https://doi.org/10.31603/bishss.458

Similar Articles

1-10 of 181

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.