Bridging the data divide: Integrating social assistance systems in Jakarta during Covid-19
Keywords:
Data integration, Interoperability, Jakarta smart city, PusdatinAbstract
This study examines the challenges and strategies of social welfare data integration in Indonesia, particularly in DKI Jakarta. It highlights the importance of reliable data for effective policy-making and service delivery in the public sector, emphasizing the role of master data management (MDM) in ensuring data quality and coherence. The research identifies significant obstacles such as data fragmentation, lack of standardization, inadequate technological infrastructure, and poor inter-agency coordination, which hinder efficient poverty alleviation efforts. The Jakarta Smart City initiative and applications like Jaki and CRM are explored as innovative approaches to improve data integration and community engagement. The study advocates for a comprehensive strategy that incorporates grassroots data collection, collaboration among stakeholders, and the adoption of best practices from other regions to enhance the effectiveness and equity of social welfare programs in alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals.
References
[1] N. H. M. Hassan, K. Ahmad, and H. Salehuddin, “Diagnosing the issues and challenges in data integration implementation in public sector,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 529–535, 2020, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.10.2.10271.
[2] B. Benbouzid, “To predict and to manage. Predictive policing in the United States,” Big Data Soc., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2019, doi: 10.1177/2053951719861703.
[3] S. Brayne, Big Data Surveillance: The Case of Policing, vol. 82, no. 5. 2017.
[4] M. Janssen and G. Kuk, “The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 371–377, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.011.
[5] C. Robinson and R. S. Franklin, “The sensor desert quandary: What does it mean (not) to count in the smart city?” Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 238–254, 2021, doi: 10.1111/tran.12415.
[6] S. Masiero and S. Das, “Datafying anti-poverty programmes: implications for data justice,” Inf. Commun. Soc., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 916–933, 2019, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1575448.
[7] R. Kitchin, “The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism,” GeoJournal, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8.
[8] M. T. Nguyen and E. Boundy, “Big Data and Smart (Equitable) Cities,” in Icds 2018, no. October 2017, 2017, pp. 517–542.
[9] M. Janssen, Y. Charalabidis, and A. Zuiderwijk, “Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government,” Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 258–268, 2012, doi: 10.1080/10580530.2012.716740.
[10] I. Safarov, A. Meijer, and S. Grimmelikhuijsen, “Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users,” Inf. Polity, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2017, doi: 10.3233/IP-160012.
[11] V. Eubanks, Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. 2018.
[12] B. Blessett et al., “Social Equity in Public Administration: A Call to Action,” Perspect. Public Manag. Gov., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 283–299, 2019, doi: 10.1093/ppmgov/gvz016.
[13] H. G. Frederickson, Social Equity and Public Administration: Origins, Developments, and Applications. Routledge, 2015.
[14] N. M. Riccucci, “Th e Pursuit of Social Equity in the Federal Government: A Road Less Traveled? Senior–Junior Exchange: The Concept of Social Equity Reconsidered,” Rutgers Univ., pp. 373–382, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Norma_Riccucci/publication/229462076_The_Pursuit_of_Social_Equity_in_the_Federal_Government_A_Road_Less_Traveled/links/54de23c80cf23bf2043abd40/The-Pursuit-of-Social-Equity-in-the-Federal-Government-A-Road-Less-Travele.
[15] S. T. Gooden, S. Public, A. Review, and N. M. A. Y. June, “" PAR " ’ s Social Equity Footprint equity of,” vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 372–381, 2023, doi: 10.1111/puar.
[16] D. Cepiku and M. Mastrodascio, “Equity in Public Services: A Systematic Literature Review,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 1019–1032, 2021, doi: 10.1111/puar.13402.
[17] J. Redden, “Predictive analytics and child welfare: Toward data justice,” Can. J. Commun., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 101–111, 2020, doi: 10.22230/cjc.2020v45n1a3479.
[18] E. Ruijer, G. Porumbescu, R. Porter, and S. Piotrowski, “Social equity in the data era: A systematic literature review of data-driven public service research,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 316–332, 2023, doi: 10.1111/puar.13585.
[19] BPS, “Jumlah Penduduk Menurut Provinsi di Indonesia (Ribu Jiwa), 2020-2022,” 2023. https://sulut.bps.go.id/indicator/12/958/1/jumlah-penduduk-menurut-provinsi-di-indonesia.html.
[20] A. Ardiansyah, A. Ilyas, and Haeranah, “Harmonisation of Indonesia’s One Poverty Data Policy Oriented Towards Sustainable Development Goals,” J. Law Sustain. Dev., vol. 11, no. 11, p. e1413, 2023, doi: 10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.1413.
[21] Sugianto, Urgensi Dan Kemandirian Desa Dalam Perspektif Undang Undang No. 6 Tahun 2014, no. 6. 2014.
[22] J. Attard, F. Orlandi, S. Scerri, and S. Auer, “A systematic review of open government data initiatives,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 399–418, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006.
[23] S. Saxena and M. Janssen, “Examining open government data (OGD) usage in India through UTAUT framework,” Foresight, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 421–436, 2017, doi: 10.1108/FS-02-2017-0003.
[24] P. Conradie and S. Choenni, “On the barriers for local government releasing open data,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 31, no. SUPPL.1, pp. S10–S17, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.003.
[25] T. O’Reilly, “Government as a platform,” Innov. Technol. governance, Glob., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13–40, 2011, doi: 10.22459/og.04.2018.03.
[26] S. Giest and A. Samuels, “‘For good measure’: data gaps in a big data world,” Policy Sci., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 559–569, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11077-020-09384-1.
[27] E. Curry, “The Big Data Value Chain: Definitions, Concepts, and Theoretical Approaches,” in New Horizons for a Data-Driven Economy, no. January 2015, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 29–37.
[28] K. Löfgren and C. W. R. Webster, “The value of Big Data in government: The case of ‘smart cities,’” Big Data Soc., vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2053951720912775.
[29] “International Working Group on Data Protection in Telecommunications,” 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.bfdi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/Berlin-Group/20140506_WP_Big-Data-analytics.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2.
[30] M. Segatto, S. I. D. de Pádua, and D. P. Martinelli, “Business process management: A systemic approach?” Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 698–714, 2013, doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-Jun-2012-0064.
[31] R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications: Design and methods, vol. 53, no. 5. 2018.
[32] V. L. P. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2007.
[33] D. R. Hancock and B. Algozzine, Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers, vol. 48, no. 1. 2007.
[34] E. W. Leigh, “An Exploration of ‘Hyper-Local’ Community-University Engagement in the Development of Smart Cities,” Equity Excell. Educ., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 421–433, 2017, doi: 10.1080/10665684.2017.1393642.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.