Communication management in facing the eruption of mount Merapi: Case study of Babadan Hamlet, Magelang Regency
Keywords:
Disaster communication management, Mount Merapi, Management cycleAbstract
Magelang Regency is a disaster-prone area due to its proximity to the active Mount Merapi. Babadan Hamlet, is one of the settlements around Mount Merapi that is at high risk of being affected by the eruption. Effective disaster communication will increase community awareness, facilitate disaster evacuation, and accelerate the post-disaster recovery process. This research aims to analyze disaster communication management in Babadan Hamlet. This research uses a qualitative case study method, by collecting data through interviews with the Regional Disaster Management Agency of Magelang Regency, Paten village disaster management, opinion leader of Babadan hamlet, and residents of Babadan hamlet. Data validation was conducted through source triangulation. The results showed (1) that disaster management in Babadan hamlet is currently at the preparedness stage, (2) the disaster management cycle is that the current situation in Babadan hamlet is in the before disaster situation, (3) there is a communication pattern from the BPBD to OPRB, then forwarded to the community. This research is useful in the Babadan Hamlet area, Magelang Regency, with a focus on the discipline of disaster communication management. The results of the study can be used to improve community preparedness policies and programs and provide insight for academics and practitioners in the field of disaster mitigation.
References
[1] S. Kristiyana, D. Siswanto, and P. E. Pambudi, “Sistem Komunikasi Radio Terpadu Masyarakat Mitra Polhut dan Masyarakat Peduli Api di Kawasan Gunung Merapi (Integrated Radio Communication System Masyarakat Mitra Polhut and Masyarakat Peduli Api in the area of Mount Merapi),” J. Pemberdaya. Umat, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.35912/JPU.v1v1.766
[2] Bappeda Magelang, “Gambaran Umum Kondisi Daerah,” Rencana Pembang. Jangka Menengah Drh. Kabupaten Magelang, p. II 1-193, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://magelangkab.go.id/images/dokumen/gambaran.pdf
[3] H. Herlambang and W. Handayani, “Pola Komunikasi Organisasi Tim Siaga Desa Tlogolele Dalam Menghadapi Ancaman Bencana Erupsi Gunung Merapi,” Lekt. J. Ilmu Komun., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 123–128, 2022, doi: 10.21831/lektur.v4i2.18519.
[4] R. Z. Hilmi, R. Hurriyati, and Lisnawati, “No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における 健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 91–102, 2018.
[5] A. Budi Santoso, A. F. Ervin, and Juhadi, “Pelaksanaan Program Siaga Bencana Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Pada Kawasan Rawan Bencana Info Artikel,” Edu Geogr., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 86–94, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/edugeo
[6] M. Ilmiah, “Geomedia,” vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 14–33, 2024.
[7] R. Afif, “Pemodelan Pemilahan Citra Gunung Merapi Secara Otomatis Pada BPPTKG Yogyakarta [Skripsi],” vol. Yogyakarta, p. Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2020.
[8] F. Psikologi et al., “Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Pembelajaran Sosial Termediasi dan Aktivisme Media Sosial untuk Pola,” vol. 16, no. 1, 2021.
[9] D. A. Hasan, F. Akbar, F. Cannafaro, N. Yusa, R. F. Santoso, and N. Amalia, “Implementasi Komunikasi Bencana oleh BPBD Kota Bogor dalam Mitigasi Bencana Banjir,” Karimah Tauhid, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1642–1651, 2024, doi: 10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i2.11880.
[10] M. I. Khatami and A. Nurjanah, “Difusi Inovasi dalam Penerapan Komunikasi Bencana pada Masa Mitigasi oleh Forum Pengurangan Risiko Bencana (FPRB),” J. Audiens, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 121–130, 2022, doi: 10.18196/jas.v3i3.13152.
[11] A. Suherman 1), “Strategi Komunikasi Bencana Pada Masyarakat Kabupaten Buton Selatan,” MEDIALOG J. Ilmu Komun., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 10–18, 2019, doi: 10.35326/medialog.v1i2.272.
[12] P. Lestari, A. Prabowo, and A. Wibawa, “Manajemen Komunikasi Bencana Merapi 2010 pada saat Tanggap Darurat,” J. Ilmu Komun., vol. 10, pp. 173–197, 2012, [Online]. Available: http://bencana.bappenas.go.id/imdff/renaksi-
[13] M. Annapisa, “Peran Media Cetak Lokal Dalam Komunikasi Bencana Sebagai Pendukung Manajemen Bencana,” Bul. Pembang. Berkelanjutan, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 102–115, 2019, doi: 10.25299/bpb.2018.3856.
[14] F. A. K and C. Uman, “Komunikasi Bencana Sebagai Sebuah Sistem Penanganan Bencana Di Indonesia,” Mediakom J. Ilmu Komun., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 25–37, 2019, doi: 10.35760/mkm.2019.v3i1.1980.
[15] S. H. Negoro, “Penerapan Komunikasi Risiko Bencana Pada the Cangkringan Jogja Villas & Spa,” WACANA J. Ilm. Ilmu Komun., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 159–170, 2021, doi: 10.32509/wacana.v20i2.1677.
[16] “18107030065_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf.”
[17] I. Lenaini, “Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Purposive Dan Snowball Sampling,” Hist. J. Kajian, Penelit. Pengemb. Pendidik. Sej., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 33–39, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/historis
[18] S. Budi HH, “Komunikasi Bencana: Aspek Sistem (Koordinasi, Informasi dan Kerjasama),” J. ASPIKOM, vol. 1, no. 4, p. 362, 2012, doi: 10.24329/aspikom.v1i4.36.
[19] M. Risqi et al., “Manajemen Komunikasi Bencana Gempa Bumi Lombok pada masa Tanggap Darurat di Lombok Nusa Tenggara Barat,” Electron. Theses Diss. Univ. Muhammadiyah Surakarta, pp. 1–20, 2020.
[20] A. Kusuma, P. Lestari, and E. A. Sosiawan, “Persuasive communication model of the ‘Satuan Gugus Tugas’ Pandemic (A case study of the ‘SATGAS COVID-19’ in Yogyakarta),” Int. J. Commun. Soc., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 48–59, 2023, doi: 10.31763/ijcs.v5i2.1226.
[21] I. Ismail and M. Resa, “Komunikasi Bencana Dalam Penanganan Banjir Melalui Media Sosial Oleh Diskominfo dan BPBD Kota Makassar,” Stud. Komunika J. Ilmu Komun., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 2024, doi: 10.47995/jik.v7i1.190.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.