Dynamics of the process of changing the presidential threshold policy in law number 7 of 2017 concerning general elections
Keywords:
Policy change, Presidential threshold, General elections, Internal parliamentary dynamics, External parliamentary dynamicsAbstract
This research seeks to analyze the dynamics involved in the process of amending the presidential threshold policy within Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. The study employs a normative juridical methodology, utilizing both statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings of this research include first, the external dynamics of parliament in the process of changing the presidential threshold policy in Law 7/2017 due to the interests of certain groups. Second, the internal dynamics of parliament in the process of changing the presidential threshold policy in Law 7/2017 are caused by different political attitudes between political parties that affect political attitudes.
References
[1] Pasal 24 C ayat (1) dan (2) UUD NRI Tahun 1945.
[2] Pasal 10 Undang-Undang Nomor 12 tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.
[3] Putusan MK Nomor 30/PUU-XVI/2018 dibacakan pada tanggal 23 Juli 2018.
[4] “Putusan MK Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012 dibacakan pada tanggal 27 Maret 2013.”.
[5] B. Sadono, “Pragmatisme Pembentukan Undang-Undang”.
[6] Budi Suhariyanto, “Masalah Eksekutabilitas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Oleh Mahkamah Agung,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 176.
[7] Alexander Hamilton, “The Federalist Paper” Dalam Maruarar Siahaan, Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Konstitusi Yang Hidup. jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2008.
[8] K. M, “, ‘The Principle of Legal Certainty as a Fundamental Element of the Formal Concept of the Rule of Law,’” Rev. Du Notar., p. 596, 2008.
[9] A. Triningsih, “Politik Hukum Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam Penyelenggaraan Negara Legal Policy of Judicial Review of Laws and Legislation in State Administration,” J. Konstitus, p. 134, 2016.
[10] Utang Rosidin dan A Rusdiana, Pengantar Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2018.
[11] S. et Al, Modernity and Implementation of Constitutional Court Decisions in Testing the Law. jakarta: Clerk and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court, 2013.
[12] M. Siahaan, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2010.
[13] F. L. Soeroso, “Aspek Keadilan Dalam Sifat Final Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 70, 2014.
[14] M. Fadjar, “MK Sebagai Negative Legislator”.
[15] M. Agus, “‘Problematika Hukum implementasi putusan final dan mengikat mahkamah konstitusi perspektif negara hukum,’” J. Huk. Ius Quia Iustum, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 548–550, 2017.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.