The urgency of exploring local wisdom in criminal case resolution in the modernization era
Keywords:
Local wisdom, Criminal case resolution, Modernization eraAbstract
Local wisdom is the ideas, concepts, and values maintained by communities to address all challenges in their lives. Community life exists in a dynamic environment, thus inherently changing over time. The modernization era has shifted communities from traditional to modern, with both positive and negative impacts. One negative impact is the increasingly diverse modus operandi of criminal acts. This situation presents challenges to the resolution of criminal cases, which have traditionally been traditional. However, local wisdom, as a dynamic guideline in community life, has in fact provided criminal case resolution efforts that can adapt to societal changes. Therefore, exploring local wisdom is urgently needed to address the challenges of criminal case resolution in the modernization era. This study is a normative legal study using secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data were collected through literature review and analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods to draw conclusions. The results show that local wisdom is closely related to community life as a wise idea or concept for resolving conflicts. This is based on the living values embodied in the community's local wisdom as a guideline for living all aspects of life. The essence of local wisdom in resolving criminal cases lies in its goal of restoring cosmic balance, namely the relationship between humans and other humans, nature, and the beliefs held by the community. This goal is highly relevant to addressing changes in the modern era. Despite transformations in life, it remains consistent in protecting cosmic balance.
References
A. A. Burhanudin, “Eksistensi Hukum Adat di Era Modernisasi,” Salimiya J. Stud. Ilmu Keagamaan Islam, vol. 2, no. 4, hal. 96–113, Des 2021, Diakses: 30 Desember 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://ejournal.iaifa.ac.id/index.php/salimiya/article/view/466
2. S. Utomo, “Tantangan Hukum Modern Di Era Digital,” J. Huk. MEDIA BHAKTI, vol. 0, no. 0, Jun 2017, doi: 10.32501/JHMB.V1I1.5.
3. I. Abdullah, I. Mujib, dan M. I. Ahnaf, Agama dan Kearifan Lokal dalam Tantangan Global. Yogyakarta: Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM, 2008.
4. E. Priscilia, “Kajian Yuridis Filosofis Pembaharuan Asas Legalitas Ajian Yuridis Filosofis Pembaharuan Asas Legalitas dalam Pembaharuan Konsep KUHP,” Diponegoro Law J., vol. 8, no. 2, 2019.
5. A. U. Aedi, “Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan Melalui Kearifan Lokal dalam Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Nasional (Completion of Lightweight Action Through Local Functions In Development of The National Law System),” J. R. Vinding Media Pembin. Huk. Nas., vol. 8, no. 1, 2019.
6. A. S. Firnanda, “Kajian Normatif terhadap Eksistensi Hukum Pidana Adat Bali di Era Modernisasi,” Causa J. Huk. dan Kewarganegaraan, vol. 15, no. 12, hal. 681–690, 2025, doi: 10.3783/causa.v2i9.2461.
7. S. Sartini, “Menggali Kearifan Lokal Nusantara: Sebuah Kajian Filsafati,” J. Filsafat, vol. 14, no. 2, 2004, doi: 10.22146/JF.33910.
8. P. M. Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2010.
9. M. Syamsudin, Mahir Meneliti Permasalahan Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.
10. R. Sibarani, Kearifan Lokal: Hakikat, Peran, dan Metode Tradisi Lisan. Jakarta: Asosiasi Tradisi Lisan (ATL), 2012.
11. N. A. Ridwan, “Landasan Keilmuan Kearifan Lokal,” Ibda’ J. Stud. Islam dan Budaya, vol. 5, no. 1, 2007.
12. Ayatrohaedi, Kepribadian Budaya Bangsa (local Genius). Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya, 1986.
13. Moendardjito, Negara yang Demokratis. Jakarta: Yayasan Koridor Pengabdian, 1986.
14. I. Mahdi, “Aktualisasi Nilai-Nilai Kearifan Lokal Dalam Penataan Kemasyarakatan di Kabupaten Rejang Lebong,” Al-Imarah J. Pemerintah. dan Polit. Islam, vol. 7, no. 2, hal. 260–281, 2022.
15. B. N. Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
16. S. Soekanto, Perspektif Teoritis Studi Hukum Dalam Masyarakat, Cetakan Pe. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali, 1985.
17. B. N. Arief, Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1998.
18. N. D. Irmawati dan B. N. Arief, “Urgensi Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Hukum Pidana,” J. Pembang. Huk. Indones., vol. 3, no. 2, 2021.
19. F. Herlius, “Kaidah Hukum Adat dalam Penuntutan Demi Keadilan Berbasis Kearifan Lokal,” Perspektif, vol. 27, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.30742/PERSPEKTIF.V27I2.831.
20. F. A. Siregar, “Ciri Hukum Adat dan Karakteristiknya,” J. AL-MAQASID J. Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan, vol. 4, no. 2, hal. 1–14, Des 2018, doi: 10.24952/ALMAQASID.V4I2.1473.
21. F. Chandra, “Peran Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Mewujudkan Pelestarian Lingkungan Hidup,” J. Ekopendia J. Ekon. dan Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 1, 2020.
22. A. Karjono, P. Malau, dan C. Ciptono, “Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Justice Dalam Hukum Pidana Berbasis Kearifan Lokal,” J. USM LAW Rev., vol. 7, no. 2, hal. 1035–1050, Jul 2024, doi: 10.26623/JULR.V7I2.9571.
23. L. Mulyadi, “Eksistensi Hukum Pidana Adat di Indonesia: Asas, Pengkajian Teori, Norma Prosedurnya,” J. Huk. dan Peradil., vol. 2, no. 2, hal. 225–246, 2012.
24. W. P. Windia, Mengenal Hukum Adat Bali. Bali: Pustaka Ekspresi, 2023.
25. I. W. Padet dan I. B. W. Krishna, “Falsafah Hidup dalam Konsep Kosmologi Tri Hita Karana,” Genta Hredaya Media Inf. Ilm. Jur. Brahma Widya STAHN Mpu Kuturan Singaraja, vol. 2, no. 2, Mar 2018, doi: 10.55115/GENTAHREDAYA.V2I2.455.
26. N. Serikat dan P. Jaya, “Hukum (Sanksi) Pidana Adat dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional,” Masal. Huk., vol. 45, no. 2, hal. 123–130, Apr 2016, doi: 10.14710/MMH.45.2.2016.123-130.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.