Optimizing carbon bio-sequestration and biomass yield of setaria grass for net-zero goals in karst ecosystems
Keywords:
Carbon bio-sequestration, Setaria splendida grass, Karst ecosystems, Organic fertilizer, Net-zero goalsAbstract
Addressing the global climate crisis necessitates innovative carbon sequestration strategies, particularly in marginal ecosystems such as karst regions characterized by low fertility and limited organic carbon content. This study evaluates the potential of Setaria splendida grass to enhance carbon bio-sequestration under varying doses of organic liquid fertilizer. Above- and below-ground biomass measurements were used to quantify total carbon storage. Fertilizer application significantly increased dry below-ground biomass (BGB), which accounted for most carbon stored, highlighting the critical role of root systems in carbon sequestration and soil improvement through root exudates. Additionally, increased above-ground biomass (AGB) contributes to carbon storage and supports local livestock by enhancing forage availability. Total carbon storage ranged from 7.34 to 37.26 tons/ha, depending on fertilizer dosage. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of organic liquid fertilizer in optimizing carbon storage and biomass productivity, providing a scalable approach for restoring degraded ecosystems. This approach could be scaled to similar marginal ecosystems globally, offering dual benefits for carbon sequestration and sustainable agriculture.
References
[1] M. Quatrevalet et al., “Random-modulation differential absorption lidar based on semiconductor lasers and single photon counting for atmospheric CO2 sensing,” in Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2017. doi: 10.1117/12.2296151.
[2] M. Ai, Y. Sun, B. Yan, and Y. Wei, “A Summary of the Impact of Land Degradation on Soil Carbon Sequestration,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/394/5/052028.
[3] Y. Avianto et al., “Integrating Automated Drip Irrigation and Organic Matter to Improve Enzymatic Performance and Yield of Water Efficient Chilli in Karst Region,” Journal of Ecological Engineering, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 175–187, 2024, doi: 10.12911/22998993/192820.
[4] A. McGraw, R. C. Ramsey, P. Obura, C. Matocha, and C. Shepard, “Topographic gradients of soil physical, chemical, and mineralogical properties in central Kentucky sinkholes,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 82–103, 2023, doi: 10.1002/saj2.20478.
[5] R. M. Shelake, R. R. Waghunde, P. P. Verma, C. Singh, and J.-Y. Kim, Carbon sequestration for soil fertility management: Microbiological perspective. 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-5904-0_3.
[6] P. Calace et al., “The C4cycle and beyond: Diverse metabolic adaptations accompany dual-cell photosynthetic functions in Setaria,” J Exp Bot, vol. 72, no. 22, pp. 7876–7890, 2021, doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab381.
[7] M. Ermakova, C. Bellasio, D. Fitzpatrick, R. T. Furbank, F. Mamedov, and S. von Caemmerer, “Upregulation of bundle sheath electron transport capacity under limiting light in C4 Setaria viridis,” Plant Journal, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 1443–1454, 2021, doi: 10.1111/tpj.15247.
[8] A. Patel and D. D. Patra, A sustainable approach to clean contaminated land using terrestrial grasses. 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-3084-0_12.
[9] N. Xi, D. Chen, W. Liu, and J. M. G. Bloor, “Positive plant diversity effects on soil microbial drought resistance are linked to variation in labile carbon and microbial community structure,” Funct Ecol, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 2347–2357, 2023, doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.14396.
[10] H. Wang, H. Cao, S. Hao, and X. Pan, “Responses of plant nutrient and photosynthesis in greenhouse tomato to water-fertilizer coupling and their relationship with yield | 温室番茄植株养分和光合对水肥耦合的响应及其与产量关系,” Scientia Agricultura Sinica, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 1761–1771, 2019, doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.10.009.
[11] C. Wang et al., “Integrated organic and inorganic fertilization and reduced irrigation altered prokaryotic microbial community and diversity in different compartments of wheat root zone contributing to improved nitrogen uptake and wheat yield,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 842, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156952.
[12] A. Bayer, K. Whitaker, M. Chappell, J. Ruter, and M. W. Van Iersel, Effect of irrigation duration and fertilizer rate on plant growth, substrate solution EC and leaching volume, vol. 1034. 2014. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1034.59.
[13] T. Yamauchi, K. Noshita, and N. Tsutsumi, “Climate-smart crops: Key root anatomical traits that confer flooding tolerance,” Breed Sci, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 51–61, 2021, doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.20119.
[14] L. Lake and V. O. Sadras, “Screening chickpea for adaptation to water stress: Associations between yield and crop growth rate,” European Journal of Agronomy, vol. 81, pp. 86–91, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.09.003.
[15] H. Xu, B. Vandecasteele, P. Boeckx, S. De Neve, and S. Sleutel, “Do maize roots and shoots have different degradability under field conditions? — A field study of 13C resolved CO2 emissions,” Agric Ecosyst Environ, vol. 319, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107504.
[16] H. Husain, C. Keitel, and F. A. Dijkstra, “Fungi are more important than bacteria for soil carbon loss through priming effects and carbon protection through aggregation,” Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 195, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105245.
[17] T. Indrawati, S. Sarto, and A. Prasetya, “Study of chromium removal from wastewater using SSF-CW model: comparison between physical adsorption by coal CFA and phytoremediation by vetiver grass (Vetiveria Zizanioides L),” Jurnal Rekayasa Proses, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.22146/jrekpros.69978.
[18] H. Koch and A. Sessitsch, “The microbial-driven nitrogen cycle and its relevance for plant nutrition,” J Exp Bot, vol. 75, no. 18, pp. 5547–5556, 2024, doi: 10.1093/jxb/erae274.
[19] S. Kumar et al., Soil microbial community and their population dynamics: Altered agricultural practices. 2017. doi: 10.1201/9781315366135.
[20] Bijay-Singh and T. B. Sapkota, The effects of adequate and excessive application of mineral fertilizers on the soil, vol. 3. 2023. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822974-3.00051-3.
[21] M. E. Azni et al., “Performance of Chlorella sp. and Multicultural Bacteria in Removing Pollutants from Nutrient-Rich Wastewater,” ASEAN Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 42–57, 2022, doi: 10.22146/ajche.69427.
[22] A. AHMED, T. AHMED, and M. D. ATAULLAH, “Carbon stock of different parts of major plant species of three ecological zones of bangladesh sundarbans,” Bangladesh J Bot, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 373–385, 2021, doi: 10.3329/BJB.V50I2.54095.
[23] S. Alharbi, A. Felemban, A. Abdelrahim, and M. Al-Dakhil, “Agricultural and Technology-Based Strategies to Improve Water-Use Efficiency in Arid and Semiarid Areas,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 13, 2024, doi: 10.3390/w16131842.
[24] D.-D. Zhao, H.-Y. Ma, K. Yang, H.-T. Yang, F. Yang, and Z.-C. Wang, “Technologies of improving water use efficiency of high quality forage grasses: A review,” Chinese Journal of Ecology, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 2312–2320, 2017, doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201708.020.
[25] Z. Yu et al., “The Effects of Aerated Irrigation on Soil Respiration and the Yield of the Maize Root Zone,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 8, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14084378.
[26] L. Jansen, M. Demeulenaere, and T. Beeckman, Lateral root development. 2013.
[27] J. A. M. Moore, B. N. Sulman, M. A. Mayes, C. M. Patterson, and A. T. Classen, “Plant roots stimulate the decomposition of complex, but not simple, soil carbon,” Funct Ecol, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 899–910, 2020, doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13510.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 M Dolly Yusufa Nasution, S Sarto, Himawan Tri Bayu Murti Petrus, Agus Prasetya (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.