Ultrasonic-assisted extraction of stingless bee (Trigona sp.) hive waste: Temporal variation and its potential as a natural sunscreen

Ultrasonic-assisted extraction of stingless bee (Trigona sp.) hive waste: Temporal variation and its potential as a natural sunscreen

Authors

  • Yuliana Purwaningsih Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Farmasi Yayasan Pharmasi Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Bayu Trimurti Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Farmasi Yayasan Pharmasi Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

Keywords:

Sunscreen, Stingless bee hive, Ultrasonic-assisted extraction, Trigona sp

Abstract

This study investigated the use of ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) on Stingless (Trigona sp.) beehive waste and evaluated its potential as a sunscreen. Samples were extracted at 30, 60, and 90 minutes using ultrasonic irradiation. The extract was then filtered and concentrated. Phytochemical screening was carried out using color reagents, UV-Vis spectrophotometry, IR spectrophotometry, and GC-MS analysis. The sunscreen activity was determined using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer within the 290-320 nm wavelength range, and SPF values were subsequently calculated according to the Mansur equation. The results showed that UAE extract, when exposed for 60 minutes, produced the highest yield of 17.03%, while 30 and 90 minutes produced yields of 9.03% and 13.50%, respectively. Phytochemicals identification demonstrated the presence of phenolics, flavonoids, tannins, and alkaloids. The UV spectrum exhibited distinct peaks at approximately 230 nm and 250-300 nm. FTIR analysis of the extract detected -OH, aliphatic C-H, C=O, C-OH, and -COOR groups. Furthermore, GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of compounds such as terpenoids, alcohols, fatty acids, and esters. SPF measurements of the 60-minute extract had the highest SPF value of 24.260, thereby classifying it within the ultra-protection category. In summary, ultrasonic extraction provides an effective approach for extracting bioactive compounds from Stingless beehive waste, and the resulting extract exhibits significant potential as a natural sunscreen.

References

1. P. S. Wu, C. H. Lin, Y. C. Kuo, and C. C. Lin, “Preparation and Characterization of Organic/Inorganic Composite UV Filter Microcapsules by Sol-Gel Method,” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/8580992.

2. L. T. N. Ngoc, V. Van Tran, J. Y. Moon, M. Chae, D. Park, and Y. C. Lee, “Recent trends of sunscreen cosmetic: An update review,” Cosmetics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–15, 2019, doi: 10.3390/COSMETICS6040064.

3. A. Mohiuddin, “An extensive Review of Sunscreen and Suntan Preparations,” ARC J. Pharm. Sci., vol. 5, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.20431/2455-1538.0502002.

4. M. T. de A. F. José et al., “Flavonoids as photoprotective agents: A systematic review,” J. Med. Plants Res., vol. 10, no. 47, pp. 848–864, 2016, doi: 10.5897/jmpr2016.6273.

5. P. J. P. Tjitda, F. O. Nitbani, and M. K. Bangko, “Sunscreen Activity of Fraction n-hexane, Chloroform, and Eethyl Acetate of Ethanol 96% Flamboyan Leaf (Delonix regia. Raf) Extract,” Maj. Obat Tradis., vol. 26, no. 1, p. 42, 2021, doi: 10.22146/mot.54425.

6. Y. Purwaningsih, A. F. Masduqi, E. Indriyanti, and M. Syukur, “Photoprotective and Antioxidant Potential of Indonesia ‘ s Stingless’ Honey Beehive,” Sci. Technol. Indones., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 137–143, 2023.

7. A. Pribadi, “Produktivitas Panen Propolis Mentah Lebah Trigona itama Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Menggunakan Propolis Trap dan Manipulasi Lingkungan di Riau,” A Sci. J., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 60–68, 2020, doi: 10.20884/1.mib.2020.37.2.1045.

8. Y. Purwaningsih, A. F. Masduqi, and E. Indriyanti, “Stingless’ Honey Beehive ( Trigona biroi) Sunscreen Activity,” Molekul, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 230–239, 2025.

9. S. Ghazi, “Do the polyphenolic compounds from natural products can protect the skin from ultraviolet rays?,” Results Chem., vol. 4, no. July, p. 100428, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.rechem.2022.100428.

10. A. A. Bin Mokaizh, A. H. Nour, and K. Kerboua, “Ultrasonic-assisted extraction to enhance the recovery of bioactive phenolic compounds from Commiphora gileadensis leaves,” Ultrason. Sonochem., vol. 105, no. March, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.106852.

11. L. Shen et al., “A comprehensive review of ultrasonic assisted extraction (UAE) for bioactive components: Principles, advantages, equipment, and combined technologies,” Ultrason. Sonochem., vol. 101, no. August, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106646.

12. Q. W. Zhang, L. G. Lin, and W. C. Ye, “Techniques for extraction and isolation of natural products: A comprehensive review,” Chinese Med. (United Kingdom), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s13020-018-0177-x.

13. F. Chemat, N. Rombaut, A. G. Sicaire, A. Meullemiestre, A. S. Fabiano-Tixier, and M. Abert-Vian, “Ultrasound assisted extraction of food and natural products. Mechanisms, techniques, combinations, protocols and applications. A review,” Ultrason. Sonochem., vol. 34, pp. 540–560, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.06.035.

14. M. A. Khan, “Sun Protection Factor Determination Studies of Some Sunscreen Formulations Used in Cosmetics for Their Selection,” J. Drug Deliv. Ther., vol. 8, no. 5-s, pp. 149–151, 2018, doi: 10.22270/jddt.v8i5-s.1924.

15. K. Patel, N. Panchal, and P. Ingle, “Review of Extraction Techniques Extraction Methods: Microwave, Ultrasonic, Pressurized Fluid, Soxhlet Extraction, Etc,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Chem. Sci., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 6–21, 2019, doi: 10.20431/2349-0403.0603002.

16. A. Altemimi, N. Lakhssassi, A. Baharlouei, D. G. Watson, and D. A. Lightfoot, “Phytochemicals: Extraction, isolation, and identification of bioactive compounds from plant extracts,” Plants, vol. 6, no. 4, 2017, doi: 10.3390/plants6040042.

17. A. G. Demesa, S. Saavala, M. Pöysä, and T. Koiranen, “Overview and Toxicity Assessment of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Natural Ingredients from Plants,” Foods, vol. 13, no. 19, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.3390/foods13193066.

18. K. B. Gutte, A. K. Sahoo, and R. C. Ranveer, “Effect of ultrasonic treatment on extraction and fatty acid profile of flaxseed oil,” OCL - Oilseeds fats, vol. 22, no. 6, 2015, doi: 10.1051/ocl/2015038.

19. L. Rahmatia et al., “Optimization of Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction Methods of Gymnanthemum Amygdalinum Del for Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities,” Egypt. J. Chem., vol. 66, no. 13, pp. 379–387, 2023, doi: 10.21608/EJCHEM.2023.187526.7490.

20. F. J. Sami, N. H. Soekamto, Firdaus, and J. Latip, “Bioactivity profile of three types of seaweed as an antioxidant, uv-protection as sunscreen and their correlation activity,” Food Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 441–447, 2021, doi: 10.26656/fr.2017.5(1).389.

21. L. C. Cefali, J. A. Ataide, P. Moriel, M. A. Foglio, and P. G. Mazzola, “Plant-based active photoprotectants for sunscreens,” Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., vol. 38, pp. 346–353, 2016, doi: 10.1111/ics.12316.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

How to Cite

Ultrasonic-assisted extraction of stingless bee (Trigona sp.) hive waste: Temporal variation and its potential as a natural sunscreen. (2026). BIS Information Technology and Computer Science, 3, V326008. https://doi.org/10.31603/bistycs.491

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.