Intimacy, control, and toxicity: A social penetration analysis of cohabiting students’ relationships in Yogyakarta

Intimacy, control, and toxicity: A social penetration analysis of cohabiting students’ relationships in Yogyakarta

Authors

  • Faizatul Ulya Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Tri Hastuti Nur Rochimah Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

Interpersonal communication, Living together, Toxic relationship, Social penetration theory, Yogyakarta student

Abstract

This study is motivated by the phenomenon of cohabitation among students in Yogyakarta, which reflects shifting social and moral values amid modernisation. Students who choose to live together without marriage often face complex interpersonal communication dynamics, which in many cases develop into toxic relationships. This condition is interesting to study because it shows the contradiction between modern freedom and local cultural values. This study uses Social Penetration Theory (Altman & Taylor) to analyse the stages of self-disclosure and the depth of interpersonal relationships that occur. The research method uses a descriptive qualitative approach. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with five student informants who were cohabiting in Yogyakarta. Data analysis focused on four aspects: (1) stages of self-disclosure, (2) reciprocal balance of self-disclosure, (3) dimensions of depth and breadth of self-disclosure as tools of manipulation, and (4) perceptions of cost and reward in toxic relationships. The results show that the process of self-disclosure develops rapidly due to physical closeness but is not balanced by emotional readiness and healthy privacy boundaries. This imbalance in communication gives rise to domination, emotional control, and manipulation, which are hallmarks of toxic relationships. These findings confirm that physical closeness does not guarantee stable emotional intimacy. The implications of this research emphasise the importance of understanding healthy interpersonal communication, which focuses on emotional balance and respect for individual privacy. Practically, the results of this study can be used as a reference for higher education institutions and student counsellors in designing education and guidance related to healthy communication in student romantic relationships.

References

1. Sumarjo et al., “Toxic communication indicators among young adults,” Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 45–60, 2023.

2. J. Ma and M. S. Clark, “Reciprocity in self-disclosure and relational outcomes,” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 875–892, 2022.

3. T. Havard and A. Lefevre, “Digital surveillance and emotional control in romantic relationships,” Cyberpsychology Review, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 22–35, 2020.

4. I. Altman and D. A. Taylor, Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.

5. M. Nana, A. Putri, and L. Hapsari, “Self-disclosure patterns among young adults,” Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 2022.

6. W. Azkia, R. Cahyani, and D. Prasetyo, “Possessiveness and relational control among young adults,” Jurnal Psikologi Perkembangan, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 55–70, 2024.

7. J. A. DeVito, The Interpersonal Communication Book, 14th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2019.

8. L. Dewi, Cultural–Social Transformation and Communication Challenges among Youth in the Student City. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2023.

9. M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.

10. V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006.

11. J. Gottman, Why Marriages Succeed or Fail. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994.

12. D. J. Canary and L. Stafford, Communication and Relational Maintenance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2001.

13. D. G. Dutton and L. Goodman, Coercion in Intimate Partner Violence: Toward a New Conceptualization. New York: Guilford Press, 2005.

14. T. D. Afifi and L. K. Guerrero, Close Encounters: Communication in Relationships. New York: Routledge, 2001.

15. S. M. Johnson, Hold Me Tight: Seven Conversations for a Lifetime of Love. New York: Little, Brown, 2008. (Catatan: Buku ini banyak digunakan dalam literatur mengenai emotional bonding & destructive relational patterns.)

16. K. J. Cramer, “Anxiety, dependency, and coping in intimate relationships,” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 30–43, 2003.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Intimacy, control, and toxicity: A social penetration analysis of cohabiting students’ relationships in Yogyakarta. (2026). BIS Humanities and Social Science, 4, V426018. https://doi.org/10.31603/bishss.449

Similar Articles

21-30 of 151

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.