Legal approaches to consumer protection in packaged food regulation: A Comparative study of Indonesia and Malaysia

Legal approaches to consumer protection in packaged food regulation: A Comparative study of Indonesia and Malaysia

Authors

  • Edy Nurcahyo Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, Bau-Bau, Indonesia
  • Samsul Faculty of Law, Muhammadiyah University of Buton, Bau-Bau, Indonesia

Keywords:

Consumer Protection, Food Law, Legal Regulation, Comparative Study, ASEAN Integration

Abstract

The increasing circulation of packaged food across ASEAN borders raises urgent concerns regarding consumer protection and regulatory consistency. Despite shared regional goals, Indonesia and Malaysia have adopted distinct legal approaches to governing food safety and labeling. This study investigates and compares the regulatory frameworks of both countries to access their effectiveness in protecting consumers. Using a normative legal method and comparative method and comparative analysis, it examines key legislation, institutional roles, and enforcement mechanisms. The findings reveal fundamental differences in regulatory structure, coordination, and implementation, which may affect consumer rights and cross-border food trade. The study highlights the legal innovations and best practices found in each jurisdiction and process steps toward regulatory harmonization. By bridging these differences, the research contributes to ongoing discourse on ASEAN integration and the strengthening of legal standards for food safety and consumer protection in the region.

References

[1] Midwest FEA of the. Southeast Asia Market Assessment 2024 2024.

[2] Azzahrani RF, Wulansari R. Protection of Muslim Consumers’ Right to Information on Imported Food without Halal Labeling. J Priv Commer Law 2024;1. https://doi.org/10.20885/JPCOL.vol1.iss2.art4.

[3] Sofiana R, Utama S, Rohim A. The Problem of Halal Certification Regarding Consumer Protection in Malaysia and Indonesia. J Hum Rights, Cult Leg Syst 2021;1. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v1i3.16.

[4] Ng S, Kelly B. Tracking Progress from Policy Development to Implementation: A Case Study on Adoption of Mandatory Regulation for Nutrition Labeling in Malaysia. Nutrients 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13020457.

[5] Suryokumoro H, Suroso A. Consumer Protection in the Food Sector in Indonesia: Legal Framework and Challenges. J Leg Ethical Regul Issues 2021;24.

[6] Ginanjar Y. Legal View of Employment on Omnibus Law Policy in 2020. Leg Br 2021;11:58–65.

[7] Othman Y. Assessing Snack Food Manufacturers’ Conformity to The Law on Food Labeling. Int J Account Financ Bus 2021;6.

[8] Ismail R. Trader’s Liability for False, Misleading and Deceptive Food Labeling Under The Malaysian Legislations. Int J Bus Soc 2018;19.

[9] Pettigrew S. A Review of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling in Southeast Asia: Industry Interference, Lessons Learned, and Future Directions. Natl Libr Med 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2022.05.006.

[10] Trenerry B, Chng S, Wang Y, Suhaila ZS, Lim SS, Lu HY, et al. Preparing Workplaces for Digital Transformation: An Integrative Review and Framework of Multi-Level Factors. Front Psychol 2021;12:1–24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766.

[11] Mahmood A. Food Date Labelling and the Consumer Knowledge 2023;8.

[12] Ahmad NI. Tracking Progress from Policy Development to Implementation: A Case Study on Adoption of Mandatory Regulation for Nutrition Labelling in Malaysia. Nutrients 2021;13:457. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13020457.

[13] Wibowo AM. Assessing Consumer Protection in Indonesia’s Cooking Oil Market: Lessons from the Minyakita Case. SIGn J Huk 2025;7:223–47. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.434.

[14] Talati Z. Consumers’ Perceptions of Five Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels: An Experimental Study across 12 Countries. Nutrients 2019;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11081934.

[15] C N, Jáuregui A, Contreras-Manzano A. Impact of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchasing Intentions: A Randomized Experiment in Low- and Middle-Income Mexican Adults. BMC Public Health 2020;20:463. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08549-0.

[16] Lwin MO. Food Safety Policy in ASEAN: Progress and Challenges. Food Control 2020:106–13.

[17] Athukorala P. Non-Tariff Measures and Food Trade in ASEAN. World Econ 2021;44:3369–88.

[18] Aziz YA, Chok N V. The Role of Halal Certification in Malaysia. Middle East J Sci Res 2013;13:1–7.

[19] Rahman F. The Implementation of Halal Product Assurance Law in Indonesia. Indones J Islam Muslim Soc 2021;11:75–98.

[20] Norazmir MN. Consumer Awareness and Understanding of Front-of-Pack (FOP) Energy Icon Labelling in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. Malays J Nutr 2019;25:267–76.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-01

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Legal approaches to consumer protection in packaged food regulation: A Comparative study of Indonesia and Malaysia. (2025). BIS Humanities and Social Science, 3, V325009. https://doi.org/10.31603/bishss.394

Similar Articles

1-10 of 89

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.