A conceptual green IT implementation maturity model for organizational information systems development: Measurement instrument and improvement roadmap
Keywords:
Green IT, Maturity model, Measurement instrument, Sustainability, Organizational information systemsAbstract
Organizations are increasingly required to implement environmentally responsible practices, including in the management of information systems. However, many organizations lack standardized tools to measure their current Green IT implementation maturity or plan structured improvements. This study aims to develop a maturity model, design a reliable and valid measurement instrument, and construct improvement roadmaps to guide organizations toward sustainable IT practices. Using a mixed-methods approach combining literature review, expert interviews, and survey-based data analysis, this research identifies five key dimensions of Green IT maturity: governance, policies and procedures, ICT asset management, integration into business processes, and pro-environmental culture. The resulting measurement demonstrates high reliability and construct validity and enables classification of organizations into maturity levels. Practical roadmaps are provided to help organizations advance from lower to higher maturity stages. The findings contribute to a robust tool for regular assessment and strategic planning of Green IT practices.
References
1. S. Murugesan, “Harnessing Green IT: Principles and practices,” IT Professional, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2008.
2. M. Molla, S. Pittayachawan, B. Corbitt, and D. Deng, “An international survey on green IT: What practices and technologies do organizations implement?” Communications of the ACM, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 118–123, 2011.
3. R. Harmon and N. Auseklis, “Sustainable IT services: Assessing the impact of green computing practices,” in PICMET ‘09, Portland, OR, 2009, pp. 1707–1717.
4. J. Dedrick, “Green IS: Concepts and issues for information systems research,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 27, pp. 173–184, 2010.
5. T. B. Hilty and B. Aebischer, “ICT for sustainability: An emerging research field,” in ICT Innovations for Sustainability, AISC, vol. 310, Springer, 2015, pp. 3–36.
6. A. Pradhan and C. Mbohwa, “Development of biofuels in South Africa: Challenges and opportunities,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 39, pp. 1089–1100, 2014.
7. M. M. Hasan, A. S. A. Alshammari, and H. R. Motahari-Nezhad, “A maturity model for green IT: A case study of a telecommunications company,” Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, vol. 28, p. 100406, 2020.
8. J. vom Brocke, S. Seidel, and J. Recker, “Green business process management: Towards the sustainable enterprise,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 698–714, 2012.
9. A. S. Abubakar, S. Behravesh, S. Rezapouraghdam, and S. Y. Y. Tanova, “Applying Green IT maturity model in developing countries: Challenges and opportunities,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 172, p. 121012, 2021.
10. P. S. Johnson and G. J. Smith, “Measuring Green IT: Developing and validating a measurement instrument,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 235, pp. 878–889, 2019.
11. S. Murugesan and G. Gangadharan, “Harnessing Green IT: Principles, practices, and technologies,” Wiley Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering, pp. 1–13, 2009.
12. J. Kotter, Leading Change. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
13. P. Weill and J. W. Ross, IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press, 2004.
14. J. Dedrick, “Green IS: Concepts and issues for information systems research,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 27, pp. 173–184, 2010.
15. S. Seidel, J. Recker, and J. vom Brocke, “Sensemaking and sustainable practicing: Functional affordances of information systems in green transformations,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1275–1299, 2013.
16. A. Bandura, “Social cognitive theory of organizational management,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 361–384, 1989.
17. M. Becker, R. Knackstedt, and J. Pöppelbuß, “Developing maturity models for IT management,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 213–222, 2009.
18. R. P. Bostrom and J. S. Heinen, “MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 17–32, 1977.
19. A. S. Abubakar, S. Behravesh, S. Rezapouraghdam, and S. Y. Y. Tanova, “Applying Green IT maturity model in developing countries: Challenges and opportunities,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 172, p. 121012, 2021.
20. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 14001:2015 Environmental Management Systems Requirements with Guidance for Use. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2015.
21. S. S. Gupta, M. Molla, and A. Chaudhuri, “IT eco-sustainability and the greening of enterprise IT: A strategic framework,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 293–314, 2016.
22. A. M. Gholami, S. Watson, M. Hasan, and R. Moeini, “Green IT adoption: A motivational perspective,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 56, pp. 93–102, 2013.
23. S. Malhotra, A. Grover, and S. Singh, “Green IT: An empirical study of awareness and adoption in developing countries,” Journal of Global Information Technology Management, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 189–210, 2021.
24. D. R. Chen, P. Preston, and J. Swinkels, “A framework for assessing Green IT maturity in public sector organizations,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 4, p. 101395, 2019.
25. K. S. Hasan and S. H. Rahman, “Integrating ISO 14001 environmental management systems with IT governance frameworks: A Green IT perspective,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 44, pp. 141–151, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.